The fine was the first one issued by the Wage and Hour Division under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 – a statute that raised the penalty to $50,000 for each violation of child labor laws resulting in death or injury. Subsequent violations of the same laws result in maximum fines of $100,000.

The demolition company must also pay more than $3,000 for failing to keep accurate records, which investigators believe may have contributed to the accident. Additionally, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the company nearly $24,000 in penalties for seven safety violations at the work site where Luis Montoya, 15, was killed.

Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, herself a longtime crusader for workers’ rights said “the federal rules governing the employment of minors are clear, and the consequences for failing to comply are serious.”

“Young workers must be employed safely and legally,” she said.

The Wage and Hour Division lists on its web site industries that it deems too unsafe for workers younger than 18. “Occupations involved in wrecking, demolition, and shipbreaking operations” are among those trades listed as unfit for minors.

The Wage and Hour Division’s investigation of the company also uncovered extensive violations of FLSA overtime pay regulations. The agency cited Demon Demo on violations involving 126 workers and ordered it to pay $108,869 in back wages.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution suggested that Montoya’s family may seek legal action against the demolition company. “They don’t feel fully vindicated,” the family’s attorney told the AJC. “This is a company that received a $50,000 fine, yet this is the third time this company has been in violation.”

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Teenager’s death leads to multiple FLSA and OSHA fines for Georgia company

In his decision, the arbitrator said that the case “demonstrates action that went beyond mere negligence.”

“This overtime ruling against the EEOC is vindication that the ‘model employer’ should not be exploiting the dedication of its hardworking employees,” said Gabrielle Martin, president of the National Council of EEOC Locals.

In the Washington Post report, acting EEOC Chairman, Stuart J. Ishimaru, said that “Going forward, the agency will examine its overtime practices and make any necessary changes.”

“We want to do overtime right,” he added.

The EEOC employees union filed a grievance in 2006, alleging that employees received compensatory time rather than overtime pay. The disputed practice, which stretches back to 2003 and continues to this day, represents a violation of FLSA rules. The situation appeared even uglier when the arbitrator found that employees almost never requested comp time. In effect, all the extra hours employees worked amounted to neither extra time nor extra pay.

“With rare exception in this record, the concept of ‘requesting’ compensatory time was a fiction,” the arbitrator said in his decision.

According to the Washington Post, the EEOC is dealing with an “unprecedented level” of discrimination charges, up 26 percent from 2006. Concurrent with the rise in complaints is a drop in EEOC staff, which has withered 25% in the last 8 years,effectively leaving less people to deal with more work.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › EEOC violated FLSA rules for years

Buffalo Rock is one of the country’s largest privately owned Pepsi-Cola bottlers with 14 distribution centers in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Its distribution area covers a population of 6.5 million.

Employees represented by the suit contend that Buffalo Rock violated the Fair Labor Standards Act when it failed to pay them and others in the company for work performed over the regular 40 hour work week.

“Buffalo Rock knowingly, intentionally and willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay plaintiffs and all similarly situated employees the overtime compensation to which defendant Buffalo Rock knew they were entitled,” the lawsuit says.

Buffalo Rock maintains that the FLSA’s overtime clause doesn’t apply to the overtime hours clocked by the workers represented by the lawsuit.

Provisions for overtime pay are a common basis for many lawsuits citing FLSA violations. FLSA regulations exempt certain workers, such as executive, administrative, professional and outside sales employees, from overtime. However, according to the Department of Labor, “employees generally must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $455 per week.” Misclassification of employees, unclear employment agreements, or simple misunderstanding of the law are common violations of FLSA provisions.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › class action filed against Alabama company for FLSA overtime violations

Smith’s restaurant in Bolivar will pay more than $36,000 in fines and back wages stemming from its violations of the FLSA’s overtime, minimum wage, and child labor regulations. $34,625 of the money recovered by the Wage and Hour Division will compensate 54 employees for back wages.

Investigators found the restaurant had violated minimum wage laws by skimming money from the servers’ hourly pay to compensate bus staff. The restaurant also paid regular wages to ten hourly employees for time worked over 40 hours per workweek, which constitutes a violation of the FLSA standards for overtime pay.

The restaurant had to pay nearly $1,500 in penalties to the Labor Department for allowing employees under 18 years old to work more than three hours on school days and past 9 p.m. during the summer.  The FLSA prohibits workers under age 18 from working more than three hours on school days (18 hours per week) and eight hours on days with no school (40 hours per week). Minors may not work work later than 7 p.m. when school is in session or 9 p.m. during summer break.

The restaurant has cooperated fully with the Department of Labor, reports the Bolivar Herald-Free Press.

“The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division is committed to protecting the rights of workers by ensuring that they receive the wages to which they are entitled,” James Koren, Kansas City district director of the Wage and Hour Division, told the Bolivar Herald-Free Press.

“Also, the department’s child labor provisions serve to strike a balance among providing invaluable work experience to our nation’s youth, safety and educational responsibilities,” he said.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Missouri restaurant pays back wages and penalties for FLSA violations

Bobo is the founder and executive director of Interfaith Worker Justice, an organization that appeals to the shared convictions of all religions in protecting the rights of the everyday worker, especially low-wage workers.

Bobo alleges that in meat processing plants, retail businesses, restaurants, garment assembly plants, the construction industry, and several other occupational settings, “workers are having their legal wages stolen by unscrupulous employers trying to gain an advantage over their law abiding competitors.”

In 1996, Bobo established the national Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ) organization, having spent many years previously advocating for worker justice. Since its founding, IWJ has grown into a network of more than 50 religious labor groups and 20 worker centers. In 2007, the organization’s worker centers scattered throughout the country recovered $1,249,052 in wages for workers.

The organization also funds and operates numerous programs, including one that pairs seminary and rabbinical students with labor unions. “Too often the religious community and the labor communities have worked in isolation from one another,” the IWJ website states.

Raising awareness of wage theft is a formidable task, but it can be tackled effectively with the power of faith-based conscience. Bringing attention to the problem of unethical corporate practices is like shining a spotlight in a dark basement where creepy things lurk.

Bobo’s new book, Wage Theft in America: Why Millions of Americans Are Not Getting Paid – And What We Can Do About It, is another way that the activist is shining light on the “crime wave no one talks about.” According to Bobo, between two and three million people are paid less than minimum wage for their work every year. Misclassifying employees as independent contractors is also a trick many companies use to avoid payroll taxes and overtime pay.

IWJ’s website provides a wealth of information and resources pertaining to workers’ rights and the issue of wage theft, including an expanded definition of the term and answers to many questions about the problem. Some interesting facts surrounding wage theft, borrowed from IWJ’s website, are listed below.

• Wage theft covers a variety of infractions that occur when workers do not receive their legally or contractually promised wages.
• Wage theft consists of employer violations of the Davis-Bacon Act, Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Housing and Urban Development Act Section 3.
• Wage theft is endemic across the labor market, and especially in the low wage labor market.
• Agriculture, poultry processing, janitorial services, restaurant work, garment manufacturing, long term care, home health care and retail are the industries with the most reported cases of wage theft.
• The number of Department of Labor (DOL) wage and hour investigators dropped by 14 percent between 1975 and 2004.
• The number of compliance actions declined 36 percent in that time.
• The workforce covered by the FLSA grew 55 percent in that time.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Woman crusades against epidemic of wage theft

The 1,424 employees were regularly required to work more than 60 hours a week, and to perform duties not usually associated with store management such as mopping floors, unloading trucks, stocking shelves and running cash registers. The jury awarded $17.8 million in back overtime pay and an equal amount in damages.

Family Dollar, based in Matthews, N.C., appealed the verdict, but the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined on Tuesday that the judge and jury were correct in their original assessment of the case and upheld the 2006 verdict.

According to the opinion written by Judge Frank M. Hull and joined by Judges Joel F. Dubina and Peter T. Fay, the jury “reasonably determined that Family Dollar failed to meet its burden of proving that Plaintiff store managers’ primary duty was management.”

According to Beasley Allen attorney Roman Shaul, who is evaluating similar FLSA cases, in this case there was never any dispute that the store managers worked these exorbitant hours each week. The only question was should the store managers be paid for the time they worked, or was everything worked beyond 40 hours each week truly “free labor.” He says that although the opinion was in favor of employees, it is widely seen as a conservative opinion that closely followed the Congressional intent and remedial purpose behind the FLSA.

“The crux of the case was that the store managers believed they were ‘managers’ in name only, and that their district manager really made most of the important decisions,” Shaul says. “Under the Family Dollar scheme, store managers performed essentially the same duties as the hourly employees, but received no overtime compensation. This case was an important victory for these hard working store managers.”

Shaul says the Family Dollar opinion is very useful and provides clear guidelines on how to evaluate the Department of Labor regulations interpreting the “Bona Fide Executive Exemption.” The new opinion clarifies the concerns and questions many people in the retail and service industry have had for years regarding how to comply with Department of Labor rules in an ever-changing business environment.

“At the end of the day, the Appeals Court would not accept Family Dollar’s scheme of simply labeling everyone a ‘manager,’ regardless of what duties they actually perform,” Shaul said.
Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) operates 6,600 stores in 44 states, including Alabama. The discount chain offers low-cost products primarily to rural and small-town customers.

If you or a loved one feel you have been a victim of unfair wage practices, we want to know. Contact us today for a free legal consultation.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Federal Appeals Court renders important decision against Family Dollar in FLSA case

A three-judge panel in Tuscaloosa agreed with a 2006 jury that found the Matthews, N.C.-based company in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and awarded back pay to 1,424 employees, who routinely worked 60 to 70 hours a week. Their duties often included mopping floors, unloading trucks, stocking shelves and running cash registers.

The jury “reasonably determined that Family Dollar failed to meet its burden of proving that Plaintiff store managers’ primary duty was management,” said Judge Frank M. Hull in a statement. He was joined by Judges Joel F. Dubina and Peter T. Fay.

Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) operates 6,600 stores in 44 states, including Alabama. The discount chain offers low-cost products primarily to rural and small-town customers.

Birmingham attorney Allen Schreiber represented the plaintiffs.

SOURCE: Birmingham Business Journal

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Tuscaloosa judges uphold $35M Family Dollar ruling

Because of the diverse nature of the American workforce, there is special consideration given to various groups such as children working on farms. Selected terms were given for people in executive and administrative positions as well as thousands of other special cases who are able to claim exemptions to FLSA regulations.

In August 2004 the most important change to FLSA came about. Lawmakers decided to amend the document and clearly establish which jobs are exempt from overtime and which jobs are not. As a result, millions of Americans who were once eligible for overtime pay had now been ‘reclassified’ into administrative, professional and executive categories which disqualified them for their overtime pay.

Hard working Americans deserve respect for their contributions to society and should be entitled to fair and just compensation for their labors. If you or a loved one has been a victim of oversight, negligence or deceit in the workplace it is important that you contact an experienced FLSA lawyer immediately. FLSA litigation can be confusing and time consuming, and only a professional FLSA attorney will be able to get you the compensation you deserve.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › FLSA lawyers-fair labor standards attorney and lawsuits

Brown is an agent for LiveOps, a company based in Palo Alto, Calif., with a national network of 16,000 operators who work from home answering the phone for TV infomercials.

Brown, who lives in Houston, works in her pajamas and never knows what she’ll be selling until the script pops up on her computer screen.

“You have to learn to be relaxed,” Brown said.

LiveOps is on a hiring spree, ramping up to handle all the calls for exercise machines and diet plans from viewers trying to live up to their New Year’s resolutions.

LiveOps would like to add 200 agents to the 180 who are already working in Houston, said Tim Whipple, vice president of the virtual call center, whose clients include the sellers of Ronco knives and rotisserie ovens, Hip Hop Abs fitness program, WalkFit shoe inserts and the Whitney Education Group’s program on foreclosure investing.

LiveOps also handles the calls for 1-800-Flowers.com and Pizza Hut, he said.

The work-at-home model works well for the company, which must staff up when its customers are in the buying mood — and that often occurs in the middle of the night.

The sophisticated shift-scheduling program it uses can also handle huge short-term spikes such as pizza orders during the Super Bowl, Whipple said.

It’s also an attractive model for the many stay-at-home moms — and some dads — who want to pocket extra cash.

“It’s been the best thing that ever happened,” said Brown, who has a degree in marketing.

She has four children, ages 2, 3, 7 and 10, and wanted a way to supplement her husband’s salary as a middle school teacher.

Day care is expensive, Brown said, so she wanted a job that she could do when her children sleep and her husband is at home. A friend told her about LiveOps.

As a telephone agent, Brown picks her own schedule once a week. She often signs on at 9 p.m. and works for several hours. And there’s no commute.

Brown said she earns between $12 and $14 an hour and that she works about 20 hours a week. She has to provide — at her expense — a dedicated phone line, phone, a computer and high-speed Internet access.

She only earns money when she’s on the phone, which Whipple said is roughly 25 cents a minute plus any commissions.

The number of calls routed to Brown and other agents depend on their selling skills and ability to sell up — selling extra items callers agree to buy after listening to the agent’s sales pitch — as well as their speed. The better you do, the more calls you get.

When there is a lull between the calls, Brown said she watches movies or pays bills.

Not for everyone

However, the job may not be for everyone. That’s because agents aren’t paid for the time they spend waiting for calls and training, including watching the infomercials.

LifeOps treats its agents as independent contractors rather than employees, Whipple said, which means they don’t receive overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours a week. While agents can earn as much as $20 an hour, the average is more like $8 to $12 an hour, he said.

But a recently filed lawsuit by two agents in Georgia contends they don’t even earn the minimum wage when their training time and nonpaid downtime between calls are factored in. The two women argue they’re employees — not independent contractors — and are entitled to minimum wage and overtime pay.

The federal court rules in the Southern District of Georgia discourages attorney comment on pending litigation, said Mark Johnson, a lawyer with Gilbert, Harrell, Sumerford & Martin in Brunswick, Ga., who is representing the two women.

LiveOps spokeswoman Elizabeth Gordon said the company had no comment.

No office policies

Rose Johnson Branch, who is not a part of the lawsuit, estimates that she works 50 hours a week as a LiveOps agent in Houston, fielding infomercial calls as well as pizza orders from all over the country.

Branch said she typically earns between $15 and $20 an hour with LiveOps, depending on bonuses.

“The phone doesn’t stay idle much,” she said, crediting her experience and picking up every call with a smile in her voice. And there’s no office politics.

“In corporations, there are certain politics to play to get promotions,” she said. “The system has no idea you are in your pajamas. It just knows a lot of orders, a lot of up-sales. It’s a very nondiscriminatory system, and I love it.”

SOURCE: They pitch sales in their pajamas, by L.M. Sixel, Houston Chronicle

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › They pitch sales in their pajamas