<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fair Labor Standards Act &#187; Birmingham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/tag/birmingham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com</link>
	<description>Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>class action filed against Alabama company for FLSA overtime violations</title>
		<link>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2009/03/27/class-action-filed-against-alabama-company-for-flsa-overtime-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2009/03/27/class-action-filed-against-alabama-company-for-flsa-overtime-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Niland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair labor standards act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscaloosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit filed by employees against Buffalo Rock Co. of Birmingham, Alabama has been certified as a class action lawsuit, according to a report in the Birmingham News. Workers filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Birmingham in 2007, alleging the company’s failure to compensate some of its sales and delivery employees for [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com">Fair Labor Standards Act</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2009/03/27/class-action-filed-against-alabama-company-for-flsa-overtime-violations/">class action filed against Alabama company for FLSA overtime violations</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawsuit filed by employees against <a href="http://www.buffalorock.com/">Buffalo Rock</a> Co. of Birmingham, Alabama has been certified as a<strong> class action lawsuit</strong>, according to a <a href="http://www.al.com/business/birminghamnews/inc.ssf?/base/business/123788255056060.xml&amp;coll=2">report</a> in the <em>Birmingham News</em>. Workers filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Birmingham in 2007, alleging the company’s failure to compensate some of its sales and delivery employees for <strong>overtime</strong> work.<span id="more-240"></span></p>
<p>Buffalo Rock is one of the country’s largest privately owned Pepsi-Cola bottlers with 14 distribution centers in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Its distribution area covers a population of 6.5 million.</p>
<p>Employees represented by the suit contend that Buffalo Rock violated the <strong><a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/flsa/">Fair Labor Standards Act </a></strong>when it failed to pay them and others in the company for work performed over the regular 40 hour work week.</p>
<p>&#8220;Buffalo Rock <strong>k</strong>nowingly, intentionally and <strong>willfully violated the <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/" title="" rel="external">Fair Labor Standards Act</a></strong> by failing to pay plaintiffs and all similarly situated employees the overtime compensation to which defendant Buffalo Rock knew they were entitled,&#8221; the lawsuit says.</p>
<p>Buffalo Rock maintains that the <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/" title="" rel="external">FLSA</a>’s overtime clause doesn’t apply to the overtime hours clocked by the workers represented by the lawsuit.</p>
<p>Provisions for <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/tag/overtime-pay/" title="" rel="external">overtime pay</a> are a common basis for many lawsuits citing <strong>FLSA violations</strong>. <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/tag/flsa-regulations/" title="" rel="external">FLSA regulations</a> exempt certain workers, such as executive, administrative, professional and outside sales employees, from overtime. However, according to the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/">Department of Labor</a>, “employees generally must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $455 per week.” <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/">Misclassification of employees</a>, unclear employment agreements, or simple misunderstanding of the law are common violations of FLSA provisions.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com">Fair Labor Standards Act</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2009/03/27/class-action-filed-against-alabama-company-for-flsa-overtime-violations/">class action filed against Alabama company for FLSA overtime violations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2009/03/27/class-action-filed-against-alabama-company-for-flsa-overtime-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuscaloosa judges uphold $35M Family Dollar ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Thomas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair labor standards act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Dollar ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscaloosa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three federal judges this week upheld a $35.6 million ruling against Family Dollar Stores Inc., saying the chain denied employees overtime pay by classifying them as store managers. A three-judge panel in Tuscaloosa agreed with a 2006 jury that found the Matthews, N.C.-based company in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and awarded back [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com">Fair Labor Standards Act</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/">Tuscaloosa judges uphold $35M Family Dollar ruling</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three federal judges this week upheld a $35.6 million ruling against <strong>Family Dollar Stores Inc.</strong>, saying the chain denied employees <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/tag/overtime-pay/" title="" rel="external">overtime pay</a> by classifying them as store managers.</p>
<p>A three-judge panel in Tuscaloosa agreed with a 2006 jury that found the Matthews, N.C.-based company in violation of the <strong><a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/" title="" rel="external">Fair Labor Standards Act</a></strong> and awarded back pay to 1,424 employees, who routinely worked 60 to 70 hours a week. Their duties often included mopping floors, unloading trucks, stocking shelves and running cash registers.<span id="more-159"></span></p>
<p>The jury “reasonably determined that Family Dollar failed to meet its burden of proving that Plaintiff store managers&#8217; primary duty was management,” said Judge Frank M. Hull in a statement. He was joined by Judges Joel F. Dubina and Peter T. Fay.</p>
<p>Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) operates 6,600 stores in 44 states, including Alabama. The discount chain offers low-cost products primarily to rural and small-town customers.</p>
<p>Birmingham <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/tag/attorney/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with attorney">attorney</a> Allen Schreiber represented the plaintiffs.</p>
<p>SOURCE: Birmingham Business Journal</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com">Fair Labor Standards Act</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/">Tuscaloosa judges uphold $35M Family Dollar ruling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fairlabor-legal.com/news/2008/12/22/tuscaloosa-judges-uphold-35m-family-dollar-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

