The fine was the first one issued by the Wage and Hour Division under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 – a statute that raised the penalty to $50,000 for each violation of child labor laws resulting in death or injury. Subsequent violations of the same laws result in maximum fines of $100,000.

The demolition company must also pay more than $3,000 for failing to keep accurate records, which investigators believe may have contributed to the accident. Additionally, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the company nearly $24,000 in penalties for seven safety violations at the work site where Luis Montoya, 15, was killed.

Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, herself a longtime crusader for workers’ rights said “the federal rules governing the employment of minors are clear, and the consequences for failing to comply are serious.”

“Young workers must be employed safely and legally,” she said.

The Wage and Hour Division lists on its web site industries that it deems too unsafe for workers younger than 18. “Occupations involved in wrecking, demolition, and shipbreaking operations” are among those trades listed as unfit for minors.

The Wage and Hour Division’s investigation of the company also uncovered extensive violations of FLSA overtime pay regulations. The agency cited Demon Demo on violations involving 126 workers and ordered it to pay $108,869 in back wages.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution suggested that Montoya’s family may seek legal action against the demolition company. “They don’t feel fully vindicated,” the family’s attorney told the AJC. “This is a company that received a $50,000 fine, yet this is the third time this company has been in violation.”

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Teenager’s death leads to multiple FLSA and OSHA fines for Georgia company

“As corporate budgets continue to tighten, more employers are looking to classify workers as independent contractors in an effort to reduce costs, such as overtime compensation, employee benefits, payroll taxes, unemployment compensation, and workers compensation,” the plaintiff’s attorney said. “The law is clear, however, that many of these workers do not qualify as independent contractors.”

A number of cases involving disputes over independent contractor classification have made it to the U.S. Supreme Court. The court has maintained there is no single test to determine the proper classification of a worker as an employee or independent contractor under FLSA regulations. “The total activity or situation” must be considered.

To determine the legal classification of a worker as an employee or independent contractor, the following factors must be considered:

• The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business
• The permanency of the relationship
• The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment
• The nature and degree of control by the principal
• The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss
• The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor
• The degree of independent business organization and operation

A bill called the “Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007” was proposed to Congress but never became law.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Will the great recession mean more FLSA lawsuits?

According to the Palm Beach Post, the plaintiffs alleged that the club “operated an illegal tip pool knowingly” and with “reckless disregard for the law.” Despite their courtroom victory, however, the plaintiffs failed to persuade the jury of those counts.

An attorney for the poker dealers told the Palm Beach Post that a federal judge will determine how much back pay will be awarded to each dealer, estimating that the total amount would reach $130,000 plus attorney’s fees. Most of the plaintiffs are no longer employed at the Kennel Club.

The ruling will likely boost earnings for card dealers in other Florida clubs where money is commonly skimmed from card dealer tips to pay floor supervisors. According to the plantiffs’ attorney, some dealers could go from making $40,000 to $70,000 with full tips.

The attorney told the Post that the club was “stealing the wages that somebody earned. Period. So their bottom line wouldn’t be affected.”

“They were taking from somebody without them knowing it and giving it to somebody who didn’t deserve it,” he told the Post.

Federal labor regulations allow businesses to pay employees less than minimum wage if the employees “customarily and regularly receive tips.” Attorneys representing the dealers successfully argued that because the club paid dealers $3 below the minimum wage, it shouldn’t have claimed tips to compensate supervisors “who had no direct service contact with the public.”

The Palm Beach Kennel Club is an established dog racing track dating back to 1932. The club also offers simulcast racing, a poker room, and dining options.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Card dealers win labor case against Palm Beach club

The Capital

According to the FLSA, workers such as the school secretaries must be paid for the number of hours they work each week. Because some secretaries work fewer hours in the summer months, the county averaged their pay so that they would receive consistent checks throughout the year. The county stopped averaging the secretaries’ pay recently in order to comply with FLSA standards.

But the school secretaries’ union doesn’t like the change, which it claims is a violation of the secretaries’ employment contract. The union filed a lawsuit against the county in circuit court last December. The school board has asked the judge to dismiss the case.

An attorney for the school board told The Capital that the courts would likely side with the FLSA. “You can’t generally have a contract of any kind that goes against the law,” he told The Capital. “The law always trumps the contract language.”

Although the change doesn’t alter the secretaries’ total compensation, some advocates claim that it makes budgeting a lot more difficult. To steady any financial swings that FLSA compliance would create for the secretaries, the school board has offered to deposit a percent of each check into a savings account in an effort to mimic averaging their pay.

The union has a month to respond to the school board’s motion to dismiss the case.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › FLSA compliance creates difficulties for Annapolis school secretaries

The store managers, represented in the class action lawsuit Stillman v. Staples, Inc., charged the retail giant with violating the law when it classified them as exempt and then failed to pay them for overtime. The jury agreed with the plaintiffs and found that Staples had acted willfully in breaking the law. The verdict came after a six-week trial. The amount awarded does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the plaintiffs may claim pursuant to FLSA laws.

Staples spokesman Paul Capelli said that the company may appeal the jury’s decision. “We firmly believe that we’re fully compliant with the law,” he said.

The lawsuit was one of many collective and class action lawsuits alleging the misclassification of store managers have been filed against Staples. It was also not the first suit filed against Staples for violations of the FLSA. In November 2007, Staples settled a class-action lawsuit in California for $38 million. That suit related to the classification of assistant managers by Staples stores in California and the retail chain’s failure to compensate the managers for overtime work.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Jury sides with plaintiffs in Staples class action lawsuit

The 1,424 employees were regularly required to work more than 60 hours a week, and to perform duties not usually associated with store management such as mopping floors, unloading trucks, stocking shelves and running cash registers. The jury awarded $17.8 million in back overtime pay and an equal amount in damages.

Family Dollar, based in Matthews, N.C., appealed the verdict, but the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined on Tuesday that the judge and jury were correct in their original assessment of the case and upheld the 2006 verdict.

According to the opinion written by Judge Frank M. Hull and joined by Judges Joel F. Dubina and Peter T. Fay, the jury “reasonably determined that Family Dollar failed to meet its burden of proving that Plaintiff store managers’ primary duty was management.”

According to Beasley Allen attorney Roman Shaul, who is evaluating similar FLSA cases, in this case there was never any dispute that the store managers worked these exorbitant hours each week. The only question was should the store managers be paid for the time they worked, or was everything worked beyond 40 hours each week truly “free labor.” He says that although the opinion was in favor of employees, it is widely seen as a conservative opinion that closely followed the Congressional intent and remedial purpose behind the FLSA.

“The crux of the case was that the store managers believed they were ‘managers’ in name only, and that their district manager really made most of the important decisions,” Shaul says. “Under the Family Dollar scheme, store managers performed essentially the same duties as the hourly employees, but received no overtime compensation. This case was an important victory for these hard working store managers.”

Shaul says the Family Dollar opinion is very useful and provides clear guidelines on how to evaluate the Department of Labor regulations interpreting the “Bona Fide Executive Exemption.” The new opinion clarifies the concerns and questions many people in the retail and service industry have had for years regarding how to comply with Department of Labor rules in an ever-changing business environment.

“At the end of the day, the Appeals Court would not accept Family Dollar’s scheme of simply labeling everyone a ‘manager,’ regardless of what duties they actually perform,” Shaul said.
Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) operates 6,600 stores in 44 states, including Alabama. The discount chain offers low-cost products primarily to rural and small-town customers.

If you or a loved one feel you have been a victim of unfair wage practices, we want to know. Contact us today for a free legal consultation.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Federal Appeals Court renders important decision against Family Dollar in FLSA case

A three-judge panel in Tuscaloosa agreed with a 2006 jury that found the Matthews, N.C.-based company in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and awarded back pay to 1,424 employees, who routinely worked 60 to 70 hours a week. Their duties often included mopping floors, unloading trucks, stocking shelves and running cash registers.

The jury “reasonably determined that Family Dollar failed to meet its burden of proving that Plaintiff store managers’ primary duty was management,” said Judge Frank M. Hull in a statement. He was joined by Judges Joel F. Dubina and Peter T. Fay.

Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) operates 6,600 stores in 44 states, including Alabama. The discount chain offers low-cost products primarily to rural and small-town customers.

Birmingham attorney Allen Schreiber represented the plaintiffs.

SOURCE: Birmingham Business Journal

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › Tuscaloosa judges uphold $35M Family Dollar ruling

Because of the diverse nature of the American workforce, there is special consideration given to various groups such as children working on farms. Selected terms were given for people in executive and administrative positions as well as thousands of other special cases who are able to claim exemptions to FLSA regulations.

In August 2004 the most important change to FLSA came about. Lawmakers decided to amend the document and clearly establish which jobs are exempt from overtime and which jobs are not. As a result, millions of Americans who were once eligible for overtime pay had now been ‘reclassified’ into administrative, professional and executive categories which disqualified them for their overtime pay.

Hard working Americans deserve respect for their contributions to society and should be entitled to fair and just compensation for their labors. If you or a loved one has been a victim of oversight, negligence or deceit in the workplace it is important that you contact an experienced FLSA lawyer immediately. FLSA litigation can be confusing and time consuming, and only a professional FLSA attorney will be able to get you the compensation you deserve.

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › FLSA lawyers-fair labor standards attorney and lawsuits

Brown is an agent for LiveOps, a company based in Palo Alto, Calif., with a national network of 16,000 operators who work from home answering the phone for TV infomercials.

Brown, who lives in Houston, works in her pajamas and never knows what she’ll be selling until the script pops up on her computer screen.

“You have to learn to be relaxed,” Brown said.

LiveOps is on a hiring spree, ramping up to handle all the calls for exercise machines and diet plans from viewers trying to live up to their New Year’s resolutions.

LiveOps would like to add 200 agents to the 180 who are already working in Houston, said Tim Whipple, vice president of the virtual call center, whose clients include the sellers of Ronco knives and rotisserie ovens, Hip Hop Abs fitness program, WalkFit shoe inserts and the Whitney Education Group’s program on foreclosure investing.

LiveOps also handles the calls for 1-800-Flowers.com and Pizza Hut, he said.

The work-at-home model works well for the company, which must staff up when its customers are in the buying mood — and that often occurs in the middle of the night.

The sophisticated shift-scheduling program it uses can also handle huge short-term spikes such as pizza orders during the Super Bowl, Whipple said.

It’s also an attractive model for the many stay-at-home moms — and some dads — who want to pocket extra cash.

“It’s been the best thing that ever happened,” said Brown, who has a degree in marketing.

She has four children, ages 2, 3, 7 and 10, and wanted a way to supplement her husband’s salary as a middle school teacher.

Day care is expensive, Brown said, so she wanted a job that she could do when her children sleep and her husband is at home. A friend told her about LiveOps.

As a telephone agent, Brown picks her own schedule once a week. She often signs on at 9 p.m. and works for several hours. And there’s no commute.

Brown said she earns between $12 and $14 an hour and that she works about 20 hours a week. She has to provide — at her expense — a dedicated phone line, phone, a computer and high-speed Internet access.

She only earns money when she’s on the phone, which Whipple said is roughly 25 cents a minute plus any commissions.

The number of calls routed to Brown and other agents depend on their selling skills and ability to sell up — selling extra items callers agree to buy after listening to the agent’s sales pitch — as well as their speed. The better you do, the more calls you get.

When there is a lull between the calls, Brown said she watches movies or pays bills.

Not for everyone

However, the job may not be for everyone. That’s because agents aren’t paid for the time they spend waiting for calls and training, including watching the infomercials.

LifeOps treats its agents as independent contractors rather than employees, Whipple said, which means they don’t receive overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours a week. While agents can earn as much as $20 an hour, the average is more like $8 to $12 an hour, he said.

But a recently filed lawsuit by two agents in Georgia contends they don’t even earn the minimum wage when their training time and nonpaid downtime between calls are factored in. The two women argue they’re employees — not independent contractors — and are entitled to minimum wage and overtime pay.

The federal court rules in the Southern District of Georgia discourages attorney comment on pending litigation, said Mark Johnson, a lawyer with Gilbert, Harrell, Sumerford & Martin in Brunswick, Ga., who is representing the two women.

LiveOps spokeswoman Elizabeth Gordon said the company had no comment.

No office policies

Rose Johnson Branch, who is not a part of the lawsuit, estimates that she works 50 hours a week as a LiveOps agent in Houston, fielding infomercial calls as well as pizza orders from all over the country.

Branch said she typically earns between $15 and $20 an hour with LiveOps, depending on bonuses.

“The phone doesn’t stay idle much,” she said, crediting her experience and picking up every call with a smile in her voice. And there’s no office politics.

“In corporations, there are certain politics to play to get promotions,” she said. “The system has no idea you are in your pajamas. It just knows a lot of orders, a lot of up-sales. It’s a very nondiscriminatory system, and I love it.”

SOURCE: They pitch sales in their pajamas, by L.M. Sixel, Houston Chronicle

SOURCE: Fair Labor Standards Act › They pitch sales in their pajamas